People think a law should exist so that young people under 18 cannot be out after the midnight. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. #people #law #midnight
People think a law should exist so that young people under 18 cannot be out after the midnight.  #people #law #midnight PAkWB
Although there is a section of the society asking for a governing rule, that adolescents should not get out of their homes after 12AM, the other section believes that there will be a negative impact on the young minds if they are confined indoors. However, I believe that, there should be a free hand given to the youngsters, on when to roam around with right virtue.
Those who argue that, the youth should be contained in their homes after the midnight, might point out that, it ensures the security of the youngsters. Almost, these minors are inexperienced, and unable to handle the dangerous situations that might prevail at the late nights, they may land into legal troubles very easily. In addition, with this rule in place, parents will feel safe about their kids’ well-being. For example, as per the recent survey of The Hindu, about 68% of the parents voted ‘No’ for sending their kids aged between 12-18 years alone, during late hours of the night. Also, this rule must bring the policing costs and crime rates down.
However, I would argue that, this possible law might seem fair from the parent’s perspective, but it's completely against the fundamental rights of this section of youth. In fact, there is a need for these young folks, to learn the ways of the world, and to be ready for taking up any unexpected challenges in life. Instead of this learning, by locking them up inside, society is not giving them a fair chance to grow and learn. To exemplify this, in many European countries, most parents send their youngsters for a compulsory community service during midnight such as youth-police wings, vigil units. As a result, these practices enhance the thought process and the maturity levels of this young generation.
In conclusion, the possibility of making a law limiting the teenagers at home after midnight seem secured and financially helpful to the society, but, the life lessons that can be learnt by giving them freehand seems more appealing and productive in the futuristic aspect. Hence, I would recommend, that the adolescents should be allowed to roam around after midnight, if required, but with a genuine reason. 
Although there is a section of the society asking for a governing 
rule
, that adolescents should not 
get
 out of their homes after 12AM, the other section believes that there will be a 
negative
 impact on the young minds if they 
are confined
 indoors. 
However
, I believe that, there should be a free hand 
given
 to the youngsters, on when to roam around with right virtue.
Those who argue that, the youth should 
be contained
 in their homes after the midnight, might point out that, it ensures the security of the youngsters. Almost, these minors 
are inexperienced
, and unable to handle the 
dangerous
 situations that might prevail at the late nights, they may land into legal troubles 
very
 easily
. 
In addition
, with this 
rule
 in place, 
parents
 will feel safe about their kids’ well-being. 
For example
, as per the recent survey of The Hindu, about 68% of the 
parents
 voted ‘No’ for sending their kids aged between 12-18 years alone, during late hours of the night. 
Also
, this 
rule
 must
 bring the policing costs and crime rates down.
However
, I would argue that, this possible law might seem 
fair
 from the 
parent’s
 perspective, 
but
 it's completely against the fundamental rights of this section of youth. In fact, there is a need for these young folks, to learn the ways of the world, and to be ready for taking up any unexpected challenges in life. 
Instead
 of this learning, by locking them up inside, society is not giving them a 
fair
 chance to grow and learn. To exemplify this, in 
many
 European countries, most 
parents
 send
 their youngsters for a compulsory community service during midnight such as youth-police wings, vigil units. 
As a result
, these practices enhance the 
thought
 process and the maturity levels of this young generation.
In conclusion
, the possibility of making a law limiting the 
teenagers
 at home after midnight seem secured and 
financially
 helpful to the society, 
but
, the life lessons that can be 
learnt
 by giving them freehand seems more appealing and productive in the futuristic aspect. 
Hence
, I would recommend, that the adolescents should be 
allowed
 to roam around after midnight, if required, 
but
 with a genuine reason. 
Do not write below this line