Nuclear power is a necessary evil. Despite the potential human and environmental consequences of radioactivity fall out, nuclear is genuine alternative to non-renewable energy sources like oil and coal, which are quickly running out. In sort, the benefits of nuclear power for outweigh the risks of using it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary era, vitality function is greatly increasing. It can be non-renawable energy as coal and oil which are quickly running out and also it's outweighing alternative of using nuclear power. I totally disagree with a foretold statement because of damage to livings of alive environment and using it increases rate of poor families. First and foremost, vitality function has danger to environment and mankind. In other words both of using and buying it can harmful with it's smell and pollute the air with it's ash. For instance is supposed with numerous studies, in India human's take a breath every day as a smoke a cigarette one pocket. Moreover, government put endangered animals and plants' life a danger with not decreasing fabricate it in the factories. It means that human's have a opportunity to use a other non-renawable energies such as oil, wind, coal instead of nuclear function. Thus, not only State but also individuals must think about them while consuming and purchasing nuclear power. Secondly, state with using nuclear function what is unnecessary instead of supplying financially to poor families can be cause increasing number of them in the world. For example, in Africa government do not worry about population's condition with putting first producing nuclear power. In other words, supporting financially to minority familiies can be fence to not continuing poor situation in that families. It means that, spending money to not rich people is more profitable to the countries than spending to not benifitable energies even though they can use other non-renawable energies. Hence, if state think about losing poorer situation that country can be winner to all sides. In conclusion, ash of nuclear function most of time can be reason to die plants and animals and spending money to nuclear power although that country's people living poorly are main reasons why I disagree with that assertion.