nowadays, many people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas. is it positive or negative development?
nowadays, many people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas. is it positive or negative development? D97
Nowadays, majority of people live in accommodation with small or no outdoor areas in urban areas, with the increasing population rate in the world. Although there are numerous disadvantages of this, it is positive development, I think.
From one angle, living in a home with the little space may lead several problems. Firstly, it is hard for people who live in such areas growing plants or keep pets because there is not enough place for crops and animals. This may cause those people who like plants and pets to feel bored on their holidays. Secondly, it can cause health problems of those people, because they cannot do tasks which are useful for health in home without outdoor areas. As a result, health problems such as obesity may arise with them in my view.
From another angle, one advantage of living in such places is that the government can build more accommodation in comparison to other types in small areas. So providing with home more people cannot be impossible. As a result, deforestation and building many houses is not necessary and effects of people to the environment may decrease. Japan, for example, most people live in a home with small or no outdoor areas. That is why government do not need cut down forest and build many homes owing to providing with house their people. Similarly, it is more economical live these areas, because pay much money for tax is not required thanks to cost of tax is low.
To conclude, despite small or no outdoor areas may lead few problems in modern life, but it makes chance for many people live in urban areas and this is positive progress, I think.
Nowadays,
majority of
people
live
in accommodation with
small
or no
outdoor
areas
in urban
areas
, with the increasing population rate in the world. Although there are numerous disadvantages of this, it is
positive
development, I
think
.
From one angle, living in a home with the
little
space may lead several
problems
.
Firstly
, it is
hard
for
people
who
live
in such
areas
growing plants or
keep
pets
because
there is not
enough
place for crops and animals. This may cause those
people
who like plants and pets to feel bored on their holidays.
Secondly
, it can cause health
problems
of those
people
,
because
they cannot do tasks which are useful for health in home without
outdoor
areas
.
As a result
, health
problems
such as obesity may arise with them in my view.
From another angle, one advantage of living in such places is that the
government
can build more accommodation
in comparison
to other types in
small
areas
.
So
providing with home more
people
cannot be impossible.
As a result
, deforestation and building
many
houses
is not necessary and effects of
people
to the environment may decrease. Japan,
for example
, most
people
live
in a home with
small
or no
outdoor
areas
.
That is
why
government
do not need
cut
down forest and build
many
homes
owing to providing with
house
their
people
.
Similarly
, it is more economical
live
these
areas
,
because
pay much money for tax is not required thanks to cost of tax is low.
To conclude
, despite
small
or no
outdoor
areas
may lead few
problems
in modern life,
but
it
makes
chance for
many
people
live
in urban
areas
and this is
positive
progress, I
think
.
Do not write below this line