job for personal whether single or family
job for personal whether single or family WKpDq
A personal career path is one of the most debated topics in the modern world. Some argue that people should work on their hobbies and passions, whether single or married; others think everyone should consider what might be suitable for them when they are not single anymore. In my opinion, the former and latter idea has more or less benefit, depending on each personal context.
On the one hand, employees should be encouraged to take part in the job they prefer to show off their abilities and skills. Ones can only contribute the best when immersing themselves in the most appropriate environment. For example, the artist could broaden the horizon of imagination if family and company supported them in pursuing the dream. The perfect model of this case is J. K Rowing, the owner of Harry Potter, who is seen as the most successful writer in the world's history according to the number of books sold. In short, we can say, "just follow tour dream, the success will find you. "
On the other hand, talent and luck occasionally meet each other in the middle. Most of the employee cases now in the contemporary world are working on responsibility, not only for individuals but also for families. The most apparent instance is my colleague at an architectural firm. He has two growing-up children, and then 90% of his salary is spent on the toddlers together with expenses of housing, living activities, etc. Thus, he completely ignores his dream of being a salesman or opening a restaurant in the center, thanks to not being ready to risk his family if a failure happens. In summary, life is challenging when people prioritize survival first.
To conclude, it is reasonable to follow the passions endlessly if the dreamers have a plethora of supportive conditions. Nonetheless, this is for the minority, while the majority has to struggle with their lives according to the thing called "Obligation. "
A personal career path is one of the most debated topics in the modern world.
Some
argue that
people
should work on their hobbies and passions, whether single or married; others
think
everyone should consider what might be suitable for them when they are not single anymore. In my opinion, the former and latter
idea
has more or less benefit, depending on each personal context.
On the one hand, employees should
be encouraged
to
take part
in the job they prefer to
show
off their abilities and
skills
. Ones can
only
contribute the best when immersing themselves in the most appropriate environment.
For example
, the artist could broaden the horizon of imagination if family and
company
supported them in pursuing the dream. The perfect model of this case is J. K Rowing, the owner of Harry Potter, who is
seen
as the most successful writer in the world's history according to the number of books sold. In short, we can say,
"
just
follow tour dream, the success will find you.
"
On the other hand
, talent and luck
occasionally
meet
each other in the middle. Most of the employee cases
now
in the contemporary world are working on responsibility, not
only
for individuals
but
also
for families. The most apparent instance is my colleague at an architectural firm. He has two growing-up children, and then 90% of his salary
is spent
on the toddlers together with expenses of housing, living activities, etc.
Thus
, he completely
ignores
his dream of being a salesman or opening a restaurant in the center, thanks to not being ready to
risk
his family if a failure happens. In summary, life is challenging when
people
prioritize survival
first
.
To conclude
, it is reasonable to follow the passions
endlessly
if the dreamers have a plethora of supportive conditions. Nonetheless, this is for the minority, while the majority
has to
struggle with their
lives
according to the thing called
"
Obligation.
"
Do not write below this line