Families who do not send their children to government financed schools should not be required to pay taxes that supports universal education. To what extent do you agree .

Families who have their kids not going to government financed institutes shouldn't be paying taxes that help universal education. I completely disagree with the same. This essay will further give elaborate reasoning to my decision. Firstly, in India schools are tiered according to the amount of wealth a family has. It's a conscious choice a family makes of sending their children to a specific school and not out of compulsion. Choosing schools is not an option for the masses, because of which there are nationally aided schools where the populations goes in terms of receiving education. These are run by the tax money India generates and accumulates over every year which helps get the country educated. Secondly, 67% of India is still uneducated due to financial problems that it's going through. Paying tax money is a nationwide mandate and should be followed, actively and the ruling body should keep strict checks as well. If the required money is not received it affects the education on will acquire and trickles down to a chained effect of illiteracy. However, if paid on time and in correct manner we can always grow as not only a developing economy but also a developing educationally driven country. Bringin this essay to a close i would disagree of letting go of parent's who send their children to a privatised school for education and instead push them to pay taxes resulting into a better world to live in for the educated and non-educated keeping the future in mind