Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree?

It is being argued that naughty pupils have to form a separate class in order not to prevent other students from studying showing them wrong behavioral patterns. This essay totally disagrees with that statement for two reasons. First and foremost, obedient children should not be accepted as vulnerable since they are also capable to influence the noisy ones. By this I mean that pupils who tend to be unwilling to study gradually get motivated to keep up with others and try to change their behaviour for the better. My school is a great instance, several kids with poor reputation in terms of obedience were told to enter our class, which consistent primarily of honours pupils. Two months later, those previously rebellious teenagers did not even seem to have ever been naughty in their lives. Although some may think that delivering a lesson to disruptive students grouped in one classroom would facilitate their learning process, I would argue that it would become only an additional hurdle to it. By saying this I am referring to the much stronger emphasis put on the fact that these pupils are disobedient. That could lead up to them exploiting that imposed status and become even more rebellious. As a social survey conducted in 2018 by psyhoworld. com revealed, kids over the age of 10 and adolescents are able to suppress any older authority if not accepting their rules and ideas. Overall, this essay wholly rejects the idea of dividing pupils into groups under the criterion of their obedience since unruly children do not impose any threat on the diligent pupils, on the contrary, they are greatly influenced by their positive example and do not get worse in behaviour thinking that they are a kind of exceptional.