Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. Do you agree or disagree?
Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped together and taught separately. 0Bwq1
It is being argued that naughty pupils have to form a separate class in order not to prevent other students from studying showing them wrong behavioral patterns. This essay totally disagrees with that statement for two reasons.
First and foremost, obedient children should not be accepted as vulnerable since they are also capable to influence the noisy ones. By this I mean that pupils who tend to be unwilling to study gradually get motivated to keep up with others and try to change their behaviour for the better. My school is a great instance, several kids with poor reputation in terms of obedience were told to enter our class, which consistent primarily of honours pupils. Two months later, those previously rebellious teenagers did not even seem to have ever been naughty in their lives.
Although some may think that delivering a lesson to disruptive students grouped in one classroom would facilitate their learning process, I would argue that it would become only an additional hurdle to it. By saying this I am referring to the much stronger emphasis put on the fact that these pupils are disobedient. That could lead up to them exploiting that imposed status and become even more rebellious. As a social survey conducted in 2018 by psyhoworld. com revealed, kids over the age of 10 and adolescents are able to suppress any older authority if not accepting their rules and ideas.
Overall, this essay wholly rejects the idea of dividing pupils into groups under the criterion of their obedience since unruly children do not impose any threat on the diligent pupils, on the contrary, they are greatly influenced by their positive example and do not get worse in behaviour thinking that they are a kind of exceptional.
It is
being argued
that naughty
pupils
have to
form a separate
class
in order not to
prevent
other students from studying showing them
wrong
behavioral patterns. This essay
totally
disagrees with that statement for two reasons.
First
and foremost, obedient children should not be
accepted
as vulnerable since they are
also
capable to influence the noisy ones. By this I mean that
pupils
who tend to be unwilling to study
gradually
get
motivated to
keep
up with others and try to
change
their
behaviour
for the better. My school is a great instance, several kids with poor reputation in terms of obedience were
told
to enter our
class
, which consistent
primarily
of
honours
pupils
. Two months later, those previously rebellious
teenagers
did not even seem to have ever been naughty in their
lives
.
Although
some
may
think
that delivering a lesson to disruptive students grouped in one classroom would facilitate their learning process, I would argue that it would become
only
an additional hurdle to it. By saying this I am referring to the much stronger emphasis put on the fact that these
pupils
are disobedient. That could lead up to them exploiting that imposed status and become even more rebellious.
As
a social survey conducted in 2018 by
psyhoworld
.
com
revealed, kids over the age of 10 and adolescents are able to suppress any older authority if not accepting their
rules
and
ideas
.
Overall
, this essay wholly rejects the
idea
of dividing
pupils
into groups under the criterion of their obedience since
unruly
children do not impose any threat on the diligent
pupils
,
on the contrary
, they are
greatly
influenced by their
positive
example and do not
get
worse in
behaviour
thinking that they are a kind of exceptional.
Do not write below this line