Categorization of English phraseological units based on their semantic components
Categorization of English phraseological units based on their semantic components dYnXX
Phraseological units as already mentioned are an integral and inseparable part of any language, and they should not be treated only as a stylistic decoration of the language. We use them on different occasions, they have different origins and meanings. In this study classifications of many linguists such as V. Vinogradov, A. Koonin, N. Amosova, and Smith are taken into consideration. During the analysis and typification of phraseological units based on their semantic components, there were difficulties in classification due to the ambiguity in some cases where to define phrasal verbs. Additionally, two classification approaches were used throughout the classification process, one using words that are part of the phraseology and the other classifying words based on their general role in meaning. As a result, the same phraseological units may appear in both classifications. The classification itself and this work help us to realize that the phraseological units employed in the series are frequently adjusted to people and their behaviour, and the usage of phrasal verbs demonstrates how prevalent they are in American colloquial speech. The aforementioned classifications helped to gather background information and served as a foundation for this categorization, which in general satisfies the primary goal of this study. This study will be beneficial for people who are interested in phraseological units and they may find this classification helpful.
Phraseological
units
as already mentioned are an integral and inseparable part of any language, and they should not
be treated
only
as a stylistic decoration of the language. We
use
them on
different
occasions, they have
different
origins and meanings. In this study
classifications
of
many
linguists such as V.
Vinogradov
, A.
Koonin
, N.
Amosova
, and Smith
are taken
into consideration. During the analysis and typification of
phraseological
units
based on their semantic components, there were difficulties in
classification
due to the ambiguity in
some
cases where to define phrasal verbs.
Additionally
, two
classification
approaches were
used
throughout the
classification
process, one using words that are part of the phraseology and the other classifying words based on their general role in meaning.
As a result
, the same
phraseological
units
may appear in both
classifications
. The
classification
itself and this work
help
us to realize that the
phraseological
units
employed in the series are
frequently
adjusted to
people
and their
behaviour
, and the usage of phrasal verbs demonstrates how prevalent they are in American colloquial speech. The aforementioned
classifications
helped
to gather background information and served as a foundation for this categorization, which
in general
satisfies the primary goal of this study. This study will be beneficial for
people
who
are interested
in
phraseological
units and
they may find this
classification
helpful.
Do not write below this line