A growing number of people feel that natural areas should not be exploited by people, and that they should be left as they are, while others argue that humans must use this land to satisfy their various needs, including farming and building. discuss both the views and give your opinion?

The quantity of people feeling natural habitats should be preserved has been booming. However, others believe that this land should be used for people's demands. This essay will examine both perspectives before presenting my own opinion. On one hand, those who advocate for protecting natural environment argue that this helps to preserve ecological diversity. This is because every species play a crucial role in ecosystem, and the loss of any living things can discrupt biodiversity. Additionally, the preservation of animals lead to the development of scientific. For example, scientists often use rats to test chemicals, which is used for people if this chemicals have positive effects on rats. On the other hand, opponents who support using natural fields for people's demands contend that this area can improve for living conditions of people. This is because the population in the world has been raised, that leads to the needs of food, accommodations and other services has been increased. As a result, this can help people have a better life. Furthermore, this land can help children improve their physical health. The reason for this is that children can have more places to do exercises and physical actives. so, children can have a better health and can avoid diseases. In conclusion, while the protection of natural environment is essential, prioritizing people's demands to improve living conditions is also crucial. Personally, striking a balance between the preservation of wildlife habitats and addressing people's need is the most benefical. By embracing sustainable practices people and natural environment can coexist harmoniously.