Some people claim the best way to reduce the poverty in developing countries is to provide at least 6 years free education. Do you disagree or agree?
Some people claim the best way to reduce the poverty in developing countries is to provide at least 6 years free education. Do you disagree or agree? Kr6
In this day and age, there is a school of thought that whether students should be offered a 6-year free of tuition especially in several developing countries to improve the poverty status of their own nation or not. In this essay, personally, I am not in favor with the given solution due to a number of reasons in the following paragraphs. To begin with, from the perspective of national budget, this action may bring more disadvantages for the governments, due to the fact that there soon will be lack of oppotunity cost of spending elsewhere such as economy and medical system. For example, from a research of scientists, just few coutries can aid a free studying program for their citizens, and all of them are wealthy ones. Moreover, the second reason is that learners are likely to be unemployed after graduating because of numerous graduates at the same time. To illustrate, a great workforce in academic fields may led to fewer ones in labor occupations. Besides, the human resources for academic jobs will seem to be overload in the future. Taking Japanese as an example, thanks to the free tuition, most students have chances to reach the aim, being a doctor or a teacher, whereas this country ought to import a significant number of labor workers every single year. Taking everything into consideration, although it is undoubtedly that the more the authorities aid for education system, the more chances students have to access their well-paid career path. However, I believe that just a certain group of individuals should receive this action like poverty ones. 
In this day and age, there is a school of 
thought
 that whether students should 
be offered
 a 6-year free of tuition 
especially
 in several 
developing countries
 to 
improve
 the poverty status of their 
own
 nation or not. In this essay, 
personally
, I am not in favor with the 
given
 solution due to a number of reasons in the following paragraphs. To 
begin
 with, from the perspective of national budget, this action may bring more disadvantages for the 
governments
, due to the fact that there 
soon
 will be lack of 
oppotunity
 cost of spending elsewhere such as economy and medical system. 
For example
, from 
a research
 of scientists, 
just
 few 
coutries
 can aid a free studying program for their citizens, and all of them are wealthy ones. 
Moreover
, the second reason is that learners are likely to 
be unemployed
 after graduating 
because
 of numerous graduates at the same time. To illustrate, a great workforce in academic fields may led to fewer ones in labor occupations. 
Besides
, the human resources for academic jobs will seem to be 
overload
 in the future. Taking Japanese as an example, thanks to the free tuition, most students have chances to reach the aim, being a doctor or a teacher, whereas this country ought to import a significant number of labor workers every single year. Taking everything into consideration, although it is 
undoubtedly
 that the more the authorities aid for education system, the more chances students 
have to
 access their well-paid career path. 
However
, I believe that 
just
 a certain group of individuals should receive this action like poverty ones. 
Do not write below this line