Do you want to improve your writing?
Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback. It's free!


important fossils are now being sold to private ownership

The passage state that it is unfortunate development for both scientsts and the generl puplic that rare rar fossils and important fossils are now being sold to private ownership for millions of dollars, and support that with three reasons. The professor challeng this idea by saying that the advantages of that is out weight the dis avantages and cast doubt on each reasone.
First, according to the passage, the private ownership for the fossils make it hard for the pupplic to to see fossils which can led to decline in puplic interest in fossils. On the other hand, the listening explainds that this is might not be the case, The case could be the owners selling he fossils to the schools in where they can view it. In this way this would help more people to be able to see the fossils.
The second reason acoording to the article, scientsts are likely to lose access to some important fossil and thereby miss out potentially crucial discoveries abou extinct life form. The professor oppose this point by saying that these fossil passed through the scientists to confirm it is a fossil. According to this all the fossil go throw them and the will not miss any.
Lastly, the reading postis that commercil fossil ollectore often destroy valuble scientific evidence associated with fossil they unearth. However, the professor challeng this point by saying if there is no private owners, the will not be any new fossil founded. Moreover, it is much better for the science to have someone can afford the cost of looking for fossils than not having anyone doing that because of the lack of budget.
Family has been the corner stone of our community. The role of famliy has changed in last decade, and the consquances of these changes have impacted our life in many aspcets. Many people may say that the extended family is less important now than it was in the past, but for me I actually disagree with that statment. I feel this way because of two reasons: love is not chengeable and the technology development.
The first reason is that love is absoulte. I believe that love for our family is borned with us, and continue to grow as we grow. The fact that we live in different wrold, this may not has any relation ship with our feeling tawrds our extended family. As a matter of fact, my experiance is the best example of this. We are a big family. In the past, when I was achild, we were living next to each other and I mean by we my grand parents, ants, ankels, brothers and sisters. By time, every thing has changed, each one fly to fined new life opportunties, but this had not changed our relation shop to gather. We still meet when ever we can in our grandparents’ home. Some of us has to take a plan to come. This is how much our extended family is importan to us.
The other reason is technology development. No one can deny that technology has affected our lives in positive and negative way. For me technology has a positive effect in our relation ship with our extended family in which it faclitate our communication with them. Before, we should drive or even fly to visit our extended family. Now, with all of this technology advancment. We might be able to check on them every day. As a matter of fact, this is what my son does usually with his family since he is living in another country. My son uses the facebook messenger to call his grandmather and his ant eveyday. The technonlgy era we live in has not change the important of our extended family.
The bottom line, time has nothing to do with the importence of our extended family to us. They were and they will continue to be important part of our life.
The passage state that it is unfortunate development for both
scientsts
and the
generl
puplic
that rare
rar
fossils and
important
fossils are now
being sold
to private ownership for millions of dollars, and support that with three reasons. The professor
challeng
this
idea
by saying that the advantages of
that is
out weight the dis
avantages
and cast doubt on each
reasone
.

First
, according to the passage, the private ownership for the fossils
make
it
hard
for the
pupplic
to to
see
fossils which can led to decline in
puplic
interest in fossils. On the other hand, the listening
explainds
that this is might not be the case, The case could be the owners selling he fossils to the schools in where they can view it. In this way this would
help
more
people
to be able to
see
the fossils.

The second reason
acoording
to the article,
scientsts
are likely to lose access to
some
important
fossil and thereby miss out
potentially
crucial discoveries
abou
extinct life form. The professor
oppose
this point by saying that these fossil passed through the scientists to confirm it is a fossil. According to this all the fossil go throw them and
the
will not miss any.

Lastly
, the reading
postis
that
commercil
fossil
ollectore
often
destroy
valuble
scientific evidence associated with fossil they unearth.
However
, the professor
challeng
this point by saying if there is no private owners,
the
will not be any new fossil founded.
Moreover
, it is much better for the science to have someone can afford the cost of looking for fossils than not having anyone doing that
because
of the lack of budget.

Family has been the corner stone of our community. The role of
famliy
has changed in last decade, and the
consquances
of these
changes
have impacted our life in
many
aspcets
.
Many
people
may say that the extended family is less
important
now than it was in the past,
but
for me I actually disagree with that
statment
. I feel this way
because
of two reasons: love is not
chengeable
and the technology development.

The
first
reason is that love is
absoulte
. I believe that love for our family is
borned
with us, and continue to grow as we grow. The fact that we live in
different
wrold
, this may not
has
any relation ship with our feeling
tawrds
our extended family. As a matter of fact, my
experiance
is the best example of this. We are a
big
family. In the past, when I was
achild
, we were living
next
to each other and I mean by we my grand parents, ants,
ankels
, brothers and sisters. By time, every thing has changed, each one
fly
to fined new life
opportunties
,
but
this had not changed our relation shop to gather. We
still
meet
when ever we can in our grandparents’ home.
Some
of us
has to
take a plan to
come
. This is how much our extended family is
importan
to us.

The other reason is technology development. No one can deny that technology has
affected
our lives in
positive
and
negative
way. For me technology has a
positive
effect in our relation ship with our extended family in which it
faclitate
our communication with them.
Before
, we should drive or even
fly
to visit our extended family. Now, with all of this technology
advancment
. We might be able to
check
on them every day. As a matter of fact, this is what my son does
usually
with his family since he is living in another country. My son
uses
the
facebook messenger
to call his
grandmather
and his ant
eveyday
. The
technonlgy
era we live in has not
change
the
important
of our extended family.

The bottom line, time has nothing to do with the
importence
of our extended family to us. They
were and
they will continue to be
important
part of our life.

Other IELTS writings:

  1. The bar graph compares the average population in India China USA Japan in the year 1950 to 2000 with⁵ a projection to 2050.
  2. introducing the cane told to Australia
  3. Describe a time you waited for something/someone to make a decision.
  4. Sustainable Development Goals
  5. Two days ago you had a meal at a well known restaurant.Unfortunately, you were very ill after the meal. Write a letter to the restaurant. In your letter, ● Describe wht you ate. ● Describe what you feel about the situation ● Ask them what they can do about it
  6. Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society. To what extent, do you agree or disagree?
  7. Public libraries provide a comprehensive collection of books to read.some people argue that they should also provide other hi-tech facilities like computer and Internet.do you agree or disagree with statement?
  8. Some people say that 'work from home' has reduced social interaction and has more disadvantages. Do you agree or disagree?
  9. Speaking different languages has always been an extra advantage for an individual specially for students
  10. People believe that the best way to face bad situation as accepting in, while others argue that it is better to try and improve.