Some people believe that the extinction of animal species is a natural process and humans should not intervene. Do you agree or disagree?

Animal species are in endangered, while some people argued that it is a natural process and there is no need of human intervene in this process. This essay agrees to it, because protection of these animal species is too expensive and it is better to secure the animals which are useful for the humankind. Sheltering the animal species which are dying out is good but the only problem is it costs a lot. So even if we spent half the money which is spent on animal conservation, we can eradicate poverty in the world. South Africa is an example for that, this nation spent 76 billion dollars on conserving these endangered species but there is no use of it, some species got extinct, inspite if they spent that money on eradicating poverty or on any other thing, the country would be much developed. It is favourable to conserve the animals which are useful for humans because it doesn't cost very much and its even easy to focus on protecting the animals which are useful for the people, instead of focusing on all endangered species. For example, if we decide to secure the aquatic animals, it woud be very difficult and also it takes a lot of money and effort. In conclusion, it is agreed that there is no need of human intervene in the natural process of animal extinction, because it is very expensive instead, we need to focus on preserving animals which are beneficial to humans.