One upon a time lon long time ago

The topic is about the attribution of one of the pieces of art to Rembrandt. The article gives three arguments why the painting does not belong to this artist. The speaker has three arguments to disagrees with the text. First, she states that incosistentsy in woman’s dress is normal due to the fact that some parts were added later. It was proved by X-ray analysis. The fur collar was pained more that one hundred years after to increase the price. Second, she adds that shadow on the picture is normal if we don’t consider the added fur. The face should be light not dark because the nature of linen cap. The material normally makes illumination not shadow under the light. So the shadows are real. Finally, professor says that the main part of the back of the painting is original too. In addition, it was made from the same wood as other Rembrand’s paintings. New pieces of wood were added later when the fur collar was painted