art ability is natural talent or can be taught

In this contemporary world, people are increasingly concerned about art. Partly of communities assert that ability to create art just only innate talent due to the fact that innumerable legends in art field possessed natural talent. Personally. I hold firm belief, with out endeavor practices and the right education disciplines interwoven, normal person would not able to conquer achivement and I will have a dispuatable discussion related this agrument in this essay. Obviously, academic education perceived high signicant and the standardized definition in this century. People has strongly belief that students can become profession and have a insight on varied field through comprehenive education. including those associated with art. Although, the merit of modern education systems are undeniable, natural talent play an essential role in consitute a outstanding performance or masterpecies. To be more specific, a student, who equiped themselves with academic knowledge always be able to create a art product, but the number of performances or product s perceived a masterpieces by judged and estimated by professions is not much. Undoubtebly, there is a real evidence - Picasso’s father, who is estimated has talented, the artistic genes has passed generation to generation in this family, moreover, with the right attitude of the father in nurture his son- Picasso and insprised him to art, at a result, he also has the significant contribution to create a legend in the century. Last but not least, Picasso is relentlessly work and practices in his early life, therefore can not assert that he has his crowning achievement by luck or art genes from his family. In conclution, taking all into consideration, whether, people just only can create art by their natural abilitty and talent or not is still a controversial issue. Whereas, I highly confirm that success and value arts are from either natural talent and work-hard artists to develop their art skill.