well this question is quite a controversial I mean
some
environmental friendly
people
believe that
animals
are not supposed to
be protected
in this it's
because
we actually interfere to the wild world I mean we need to
let
the ecosystem and nature goes on and whenever and whatever to any level we manipulate the world or
animals
life-style
in this case
we
make
a kind of interference in their life style and we may cause a kind of ruin and
destroy
through
animals
life
therefore
they don't believe in
let
's say preserve areas
but
I
think
it
is supposed
to be you know there are
some
animals
which are unfortunately due to lack of food or I don't know natural disaster are dying out and this Extinction would not be to benefit of other
animals
so
the chain food would
be disconnected
and
in this case
I
think
humans can be a kind of how can I say protective and
let
the
animals
life go on if they provide such protective areas for
some
rare species and yes it is I
think
helpful
well this question is quite a controversial I mean
some
environmental friendly
people
believe that
animals
are not supposed to
be protected
in this it's
because
we actually interfere to the wild world I mean we need to
let
the ecosystem and nature goes on and whenever and whatever to any level we manipulate the world or
animals
life-style
in this case
we
make
a kind of interference in their life style and we may cause a kind of ruin and
destroy
through
animals
life
therefore
they don't believe in
let
's say preserve areas
but
I
think
it
is supposed
to be you know there are
some
animals
which are unfortunately due to lack of food or I don't know natural disaster are dying out and this Extinction would not be to benefit of other
animals
so
the chain food would
be disconnected
and
in this case
I
think
humans can be a kind of how can I say protective and
let
the
animals
life go on if they provide such protective areas for
some
rare species and yes it is I
think
helpful